Oh well, so you guys are familiar with economics. Are you sure you are
able to read the numbers? My Client has been losing money since 2010. In
the consolidated financial report you exfiltrated you can see that in
the first three months of 2020 only the financial loss amounts to EUR
[redacted] M. And take a look at the net financial position as at 31 March
2020 which is negative by EUR [redacted] M. Moreover, look at bond trading
level (30% yield) that my client needs to repay:
[redacted]. The
financial situation of my client is negative. I think you picked the
wrong victim and the financial analysis you have performed prior to
undertaking the hacking operations is absolutely wrong. Look at the
chart herein attached and maybe you will be able to understand that
economics is not hacking and my client is not Grubman nor Travelex nor
[redacted] (the latter, just to remain in the [redacted] boundaries and a victim
you may know).
With regard to the insurance manual you guys have exfiltrated please
note that the insurance company Chubb does not cover the expenses
related to a ransom payment but only the expenses my client is is facing
for business interruption and recovery.
This being said, my client needs to resume normal operations as soon as
possible minimising financial losses due to inactivity caused by your
actions. So we need to find a trade-off between your requests and my
client’s capability to pay. Too much money requested and really my
client does not have that financial capability. My client understands
your position and aspirations but can’t reach that amount. Overnight I
convinced my client to add more money on the table. His offer now
amounts to 750.000,00 but this will entail more sacrifices in terms of
employment and debt repayment. People will be fired amid this financial
crisis but I guess you guys don’t care about people left without
livelihood.
If you guys don’t accept it, my client will set up the new
infrastructure without data. It won’t be easy but my client is pretty
sure to go back on the business within a few weeks. I mean my client is
making the argument that the cost to restart the new infrastructure
without data will not be higher than 700-800 k USD. That amount
represents the break-event point for my client. If my client pays a
dollar more, it won’t be convenient for him. So accept these 750 k USD
or set a new affordable price or get nothing. If you accept or if you
set a price which my client is able to meet, he will start the payment
process as soon as possible, after finding a trusted exchange.
Please stop the countdown as usual during the negotiations with your hacking group.
1 month ago